1966 anti-cow slaughter agitation [Delhi, India]

[ Reported as seen ]

In 1966, a significant event unfolded as Hindu organizations in India protested for a ban on cow slaughter, a demand deeply rooted in the country’s Constitution. The movement gained momentum with the support of prominent figures, including Shankaracharya, who went on a fast in solidarity. The culmination occurred on November 7, 1966, known as Gopashtami, coinciding with Kartik Shukla Ashtami of Vikram Samvat. However, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi refused to meet the demand.

A massive demonstration took place outside the Parliament House in New Delhi, where around 10,000 protesters, including Hindu Sadhus, passionately advocated for their cause. Unfortunately, the peaceful protest turned violent when the police, allegedly on orders from Indira Gandhi, responded forcefully. Tear gas, bullets, batons, and rods were used, resulting in a tragic loss of life. Official figures state that 250 Sadhus died, but alternative sources claim a higher casualty count of at least 5,000. The bodies were reportedly transported and cremated without proper verification or medical assistance. This incident serves as a painful reminder of the need for a society that respects religious beliefs and upholds fundamental rights, fostering tolerance and understanding.

Remembering the 1966 Cow Slaughter Protest: A Tragic Example Of State Sponsored Hindu Genocide

Introduction

On November 7, 1966, a tragic incident unfolded outside the Sansad Bhavan (Parliament) in India, as thousands of saints and Gau-bhakt Hindus gathered to demand a law banning cow slaughter. This peaceful protest took a dark turn when bullets were fired, tear gas was unleashed, and authorities wielded batons and rods against the demonstrators. The events that transpired on that fateful day resulted in a staggering loss of life and a profound impact on the nation.

Official reports state that 375 Hindus were killed in the firing, but according to firsthand accounts from those who participated in the agitation, the true number of brutally massacred Hindus exceeds 5,000. These accounts suggest that the violence was orchestrated at the behest of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, casting a shadow of suspicion and controversy over the tragic event.

The demand for a law to ban cow slaughter was deeply rooted in the cultural and religious sentiments of the Hindu community. Cows hold a sacred status in Hinduism, symbolizing purity, fertility, and motherhood. For devout Hindus, the protection of cows and the prevention of their slaughter is a matter of deep reverence and moral duty.

The protest outside the Sansad Bhavan was a manifestation of this sentiment, as thousands of saints and Gau-bhakt Hindus gathered in peaceful solidarity, seeking legal safeguards for cows. However, what should have been a peaceful expression of faith and conviction quickly turned into a horrifying scene of violence and bloodshed.

The firing of bullets, the deployment of tear gas, and the brutal wielding of batons and rods against the protesters resulted in a tremendous loss of life and left families devastated and communities shattered. The precise sequence of events and the extent of the tragedy remain subjects of controversy and conflicting narratives. While official reports offer one perspective, firsthand testimonies from eyewitnesses present a much grimmer reality, suggesting a significantly higher death toll and the involvement of influential figures in orchestrating the violence.

The implications of this tragedy reverberated throughout the nation. The incident not only sparked outrage among the affected communities but also raised questions about the balance between individual rights, religious sentiments, and the role of the state in protecting and respecting diverse beliefs. It ignited debates on the limits of peaceful protest, the responsibility of those in power to safeguard the rights and aspirations of their citizens, and the consequences of dissent in a democratic society.

The events of November 7, 1966, remain etched in the collective memory of the affected communities and serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of peace and the potential for violence when grievances are ignored or suppressed. The quest for justice and a comprehensive understanding of the tragedy continue to drive discussions and demands for truth, accountability, and commemoration.

As we reflect on this tragic incident, it is crucial to acknowledge the pain and suffering endured by the victims and their families. It is our responsibility to seek the truth, promote dialogue, and strive for a society where diverse beliefs and sentiments are respected, protected, and celebrated. By learning from the past and working towards a more inclusive and compassionate future, we can honor the memory of those who lost their lives and contribute to a society where every individual’s rights and beliefs are valued.

Cow and Hindu Dharma

In Hinduism, the cow holds a significant place of reverence and is considered more than just an animal. It is believed to be the abode of 33 crore Hindu deities, making it a sacred symbol in Hindu society. The cow is regarded as the embodiment of faith, and serving and worshiping the cow are seen as ways to attain salvation (Moksha). The importance of cows in Hindu culture is evident in ancient scriptures such as the Vedas, Smritis, Srutis, Puranas, and folklore, as well as in later literature.

The notion of cow protection has been deeply ingrained in Hindutva or Hinduism since ancient times. Hindus view cows as the most sacred and sanctified among all beings. Historical accounts demonstrate the significance of cow protection in Hindu culture. For instance, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the founder of the Maratha Empire, reportedly cut off the hands of a Muslim butcher when he witnessed the mistreatment of a cow. Similarly, his son Sambhaji Raje executed a Muslim for killing a cow in 1683, upholding the legacy of protecting Vedic Hindu culture. Even the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Indian Constitution emphasize the promotion and protection of cows.

However, despite the deep-rooted religious and cultural significance of cows for Hindus, anti-slaughter Hindu devotees and cow protectors often face disdain and ridicule in India. Outsiders, like Furkan Khan, have made derogatory remarks about cow urine to mock Hinduism, while individuals like IPS officer Aslam Khan have freely used the “cow urine” jibe as a means of ridiculing Hinduism.

This dismissive attitude is not new. For the so-called liberal cabal, making cow jokes has become a convenient way to belittle Hindus when they find themselves losing an argument. Whenever they face a challenge from a Hindu, they resort to using phrases like “cow urine,” “gau bhakt” (cow devotee), “gau mutra” (cow urine), or “cow protector” in a derogatory manner. This issue is not limited to recent times; it has been a recurring problem in independent India.

Such mockery and insensitivity toward Hindu sentiments have perpetuated a sense of marginalization among the Hindu community. Despite the constitutional commitment to respect and protect the diverse beliefs and practices of all citizens, there is a lack of understanding and empathy when it comes to the religious sentiments of Hindus, particularly regarding the cow.

It is crucial for a diverse and inclusive society to acknowledge and respect the religious beliefs and cultural practices of all its constituents. Hindus, like followers of any other religion, deserve to have their beliefs treated with sensitivity and understanding. By promoting dialogue, empathy, and mutual respect, we can foster a society that values the diversity of religious expressions and fosters a sense of harmony and coexistence.

The massacre

In 1966, a significant event unfolded as Hindu organizations across India agitated for a ban on cow slaughter, a demand deeply rooted in the Constitution of India. The agitation gained momentum with the participation of prominent figures, including the revered Shankaracharya, who embarked on a fast in support of the cause. The culmination of this movement took place on 7th November 1966, a day known as Gopashtami among Hindus, which coincided with Kartik Shukla Ashtami of Vikram Samvat.

However, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi did not accede to the demands for a ban on cow slaughter. A massive demonstration ensued outside Sansad Bhavan, the Parliament House in New Delhi, with an estimated 10,000 protesters comprising Hindu Sadhus and devotees vehemently advocating for the cause. Despite their peaceful intentions, their attempts to storm the parliament were met with opposition. The Delhi police, allegedly acting on the orders of Indira Gandhi, confronted the protesters with a brutal display of force. Tear gas shells were fired, bullets were sprayed, and the police charged at the demonstrators with batons and rods. The clash between the authorities and the protesters resulted in a tragic loss of life.

Official figures indicate that 250 Sadhus lost their lives on that fateful day in the streets of Delhi. However, alternative sources claim a much higher casualty count, asserting that at least 5,000 saints and Hindu devotees were mercilessly murdered. In the aftermath of the violence, it is believed that the bodies of the deceased were callously loaded onto trucks under the cover of darkness and transported to the ridge area outside Delhi. Shockingly, without proper verification of vital signs, the bodies were cremated, depriving any survivors of the chance for rescue or medical intervention.

The events of that day in 1966 serve as a painful reminder of the brutality inflicted upon those who peacefully advocated for their beliefs and sought to protect the sacred cow, a symbol deeply revered in Hinduism. The tragic loss of lives during the demonstration highlights the desperate need for a society that respects and upholds religious sentiments and rights, ensuring that peaceful protests are met with understanding and dialogue rather than violence and repression.

Such incidents underscore the importance of nurturing a culture of tolerance, inclusivity, and mutual respect. It is crucial to recognize and honor the diversity of beliefs and practices within a society while safeguarding the fundamental rights of all individuals. By fostering an environment where differing viewpoints can be expressed and addressed peacefully, we can work towards a society that embraces harmony, empathy, and a deep appreciation for the values cherished by its citizens.

Aftermath

In the aftermath of the tragic events that unfolded in Delhi, prominent spiritual leaders and activists expressed their outrage and grief. The revered Shankracharya Niranjandev Tirth, Swami Hariharananda Ji, popularly known as Karpatriji Maharaj, and Mahatma Ramchandra Veer took a bold stand by embarking on a fast unto death to protest the brutal killings of sadhus and Gau-bhakt devotees. Mahatma Ramchandra Veer, in particular, demonstrated immense resolve by observing a fast that lasted a staggering 166 days.

These fasting saints aimed to draw attention to the grave injustice that had occurred and to demand justice for the victims. Their selfless sacrifice and unwavering commitment to the cause brought national attention to the issue and created a sense of urgency among the public.

Recognizing the gravity of the situation, Yashwantrao Balwantrao Chavan, who would later serve as the Home Minister from November 1966 to June 1970, approached the fasting saints. Chavan, seen by many as a puppet of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, made assurances that an “anti-slaughter bill” would be introduced in the upcoming session of parliament. Encouraged by these promises, the fasting saints agreed to end their protest.

Unfortunately, the Congress government, known for its anti-Hindu stance, failed to fulfill its commitment. The promised bill to ban cow slaughter was never brought forward, leaving the saints and the Hindu community deeply disillusioned. This betrayal by the government further exacerbated the already prevailing sense of injustice and discrimination felt by the Hindu population.

The aftermath of the Delhi massacre and the broken promises by the government served as a stark reminder of the uphill battle faced by those seeking to protect the sanctity of cows and uphold Hindu beliefs. It highlighted the need for a government that genuinely respects and values the sentiments of its citizens, regardless of their religious affiliations. The failure to enact meaningful legislation to safeguard the cow, an animal deeply revered in Hinduism, reflected the continued marginalization of Hindu voices within the political landscape.

The repercussions of the government’s inaction were far-reaching. The disillusionment and frustration felt by the Hindu community served as a catalyst for increased activism and awareness about the importance of protecting Hindu traditions and beliefs. The events surrounding the aftermath of the Delhi massacre laid the foundation for a renewed determination among Hindus to fight for their rights and assert their cultural identity.

Ultimately, the aftermath of the tragedy highlighted the necessity for a society that upholds religious freedom and respects the beliefs and practices of all its citizens. It emphasized the need for meaningful dialogue, empathy, and mutual understanding to bridge the gaps between different communities and create a harmonious and inclusive society.

The memory of the broken promises and the sense of injustice experienced by the Hindu community continues to shape their activism and their efforts to protect their cherished traditions. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for religious freedom and the importance of holding those in power accountable to their commitments.

Conclusion

The events surrounding the Delhi massacre and its aftermath were a tragic reminder of the challenges faced by the Hindu community in upholding their beliefs and traditions. The brutal killing of sadhus and Gau-bhakt devotees shook the nation and drew attention to the need for justice and protection for the sacred cow.

Despite the brave efforts of fasting saints and activists who sought to bring attention to the issue, the promises made by the government went unfulfilled. The failure to pass an “anti-slaughter bill” demonstrated a disregard for the sentiments and beliefs of the Hindu community. This betrayal deepened the sense of injustice and discrimination felt by Hindus and highlighted the need for a government that respects and upholds the rights of all its citizens.

The aftermath of the Delhi massacre ignited a renewed spirit of activism and awareness among Hindus. It served as a catalyst for increased efforts to protect Hindu traditions and assert their cultural identity. The memory of broken promises and the sense of disillusionment continue to drive the Hindu community’s fight for religious freedom and their determination to hold those in power accountable.

The events surrounding the Delhi massacre also underline the importance of meaningful dialogue, empathy, and understanding between different religious communities. It is crucial to foster an environment where all citizens can express their religious beliefs without fear of marginalization or discrimination.

Moving forward, it is imperative for society to recognize and respect the significance of the cow in Hinduism. Upholding the sanctity of the cow is not just a religious matter but also a matter of preserving cultural heritage and promoting communal harmony. Governments and policymakers must listen to the voices of the people and work towards enacting legislation that reflects the sentiments and values of the diverse population they serve.

In conclusion, the aftermath of the Delhi massacre serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for religious freedom and the need for a society that respects and protects the beliefs and traditions of all its citizens. It highlights the importance of accountability, dialogue, and mutual respect in building a harmonious and inclusive society.

CITATIONS AND SOURCES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1966_anti-cow_slaughter_agitation#:~:text=The%20total%20damage%20was%20estimated,of%20reverence%20in%20Hindu%20society.

https://www.indiatoday.in/fact-check/story/fact-check-1966-incident-police-firing-sadhus-goes-viral-with-exaggerated-claims-1884800-2021-12-06

1966 Hindu massacre in Delhi: When Indira Gandhi government killed hundreds of Sadhus and Gau rakshaks